The Senate is scheduled to begin voting on proposed amendments
to the health care reform bill today. It takes 60 votes to pass an
amendment and most of the proposed measures for the health care bill
will never pass. It’s a great opportunity to grandstand over pet
issues, however.

For example, Sen. John McCain wants to eliminate about $500 million
in Medicare cost savings, which he’s trying to portray as Medicare
cuts. In fact, these savings will not result in cuts to benefits.
McCain is getting hammered by Democrats for reversing on the Medicare
issue. As Nick Baumann reports for Mother Jones, McCain promised to fund health care reform with Medicare savings
when he ran for president in 2008. Much of the proposed savings would
come from eliminating over-payments to private insurers. As Harry
Reid’s spokesman told Brian Beutler of Talking Points Memo, protecting
this revenue stream amounts to “a big fat wet kiss” to McCain’s friends in the insurance industry.

Alex Koppelman of Salon reports that conservative Democrat Ben Nelson (D-NE) will try to get a mirror image of the Stupak Amendment added to the Senate bill. As Koppelman observes, it’s unlikely that Nelson has the votes.

Even if the controversial, anti-abortion Stupak language stays out
of the Senate bill, legislators will have to revisit the issue of
federal funding for abortion coverage when the House and the Senate put
their respective bills together to form the final legislation.

Roger Bybee of Working In These times reports that the Stupak Amendment has become a major headache
for organized labor. Many union leaders see the Stupak Amendment as a
wedge issue that is dividing advocates of health care reform within the
labor movement. For example, Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-MI), one of labor’s
staunchest allies in the House, voted for the Stupak Amendment.

The Stupak wars have been an opportunity for religious groups like
the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to flex their lobbying muscle.
If a secular organization wanted to send its staffers to practically
camp out in legislators’ offices during key floor votes, they’d have to
register as lobbyists and disclose how they spend their money. Carol
Joffe of Rewire wonders whatever happened to the separation of church and state
in the era of lobbying. She makes an important point. Why should
lobbyists get special treatment because their fees are paid from
collection plates?

Progressives are clamoring for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
(D-NV) to use budget reconciliation to thwart a filibuster and pass a
health reform bill by majority vote. Alex Koppelman of Salon takes an
in-depth look at the procedural obstacles
of such a strategy. One of the major sticking points is that budget
reconciliation can only be used to pass legislation that has to do with
the budget. In order to qualify, the final bill would have to be
contorted in various ways that progressives might not like. Koppelman
argues that the public option could be a casualty of reconciliation.

In other health-related news, Lincoln University has embraced
fat-shaming as a tool for behavioral change. In an effort to curb high
rates of obesity among its students, the school has ordered students
with a body mass index over 30 to attend 3 hours of gym class per week.
If they don’t, they can’t graduate. Samhita Mukhopadhyay of Feministing characterizes the plan as a form of fat hate. She argues that, like many dieters, Lincoln has lost sight of health in its pursuit of sveltness.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about health care by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. Visit the Pulse for a complete list of articles on health care reform, or follow us on Twitter. And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy, environment, health care and immigration issues, check out The Audit, The Mulch, and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of leading independent media outlets.