The Rumor Mill: Who Needs Evidence Anyway?
Negotiations on final language for the political declaration at the UNGASS on AIDS are not going well.
Perhaps adding to the tension is one bit of language that the US delegation is suggesting: they want to change "evidence-based" (as in "evidence-based sexuality education," "evidence-based prevention efforts," etc.) to "evidence-informed."
Evidence-informed?! Imagine the ramifications of such a document -- one that is supposed to be providing guidance for international response to HIV/AIDS... "Yes, we're aware of the evidence. We have been informed. But we'd rather not do it that way."
As the public health community continues to voice its concern about the triumph of ideology over science (perhaps now over reason as well?), this news suggests that the US delegation is not listening.
Negotiations on final language for the political declaration at the UNGASS on AIDS are not going well.
Perhaps adding to the tension is one bit of language that the US delegation is suggesting: they want to change "evidence-based" (as in "evidence-based sexuality education," "evidence-based prevention efforts," etc.) to "evidence-informed."
Evidence-informed?! Imagine the ramifications of such a document — one that is supposed to be providing guidance for international response to HIV/AIDS… "Yes, we're aware of the evidence. We have been informed. But we'd rather not do it that way."
As the public health community continues to voice its concern about the triumph of ideology over science (perhaps now over reason as well?), this news suggests that the US delegation is not listening.