Use quotes to search for exact phrases. Use AND/OR/NOT between keywords or phrases for more precise search results.

Kansas Amendments to Statutes Regulating Abortion (SB 448)

This law was last updated on Aug 19, 2014


This law is Anti–Choice

State

Kansas

Number

SB 448

Status

Failed to Pass

Proposed

Mar 20, 2014

Topics

Informed Consent, Omnibus (multiple topics)

Full Bill Text

kslegislature.org

SB 448 was drafted in response to lawsuits challenging sections of the 2013 omnibus bill, HB 2253 (See Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. Templeton and Hodes & Nauser MDs, P.A. v. Schmidt.)

This bill would have amended different statutes pertaining to abortion, and added or revised certain definitions to make them consistent throughout all relevant statutes. The new definitions would have applied to provisions on licensing abortion facilities, medical emergencies involving abortion, abortions for minors, and abortions at facilities owned by the University of Kansas Hospital Authority.

SB 448 would have modified the requirement in SB 2253 that abortion care providers post a link to the so-called “Woman’s Right to Know” website which contains misinformation about abortion including the medically inaccurate claim that abortion is linked to breast cancer. Though this bill would not have removed the obligation to publish the misinformation, it would have eliminated the requirement that providers endorse the misinformation as “objective, nonjudgmental, scientifically accurate.”

This bill would have further limited the ability of physicians to provide lawful abortion by prohibiting them from considering mental or psychological harm as factors that could provide exceptions for an abortion after 20 weeks. This bill would have done this by creating a new, narrow definition of “bodily function,” which would have explicitly excluded mental and emotional functions. This would have ensured that in all the abortion laws that refer to the impairment of “bodily functions”  as a legal exception to abortion after 20 weeks, there would have been no mistaking the possibility of damaging mental or emotional function as a legal reason for an emergency abortion.

In June 2013, as a result of the Center for Reproductive Rights lawsuit, the state court judge temporarily blocked the provisions of HB 2253 that would have made it nearly impossible for a woman to obtain an abortion in an emergency. (See Hodes & Nauser MDs, P.A. v. Schmidt.) HB 2253 redefined “medical emergency” in a way that would require many pregnant women in life-threatening situations to wait at least 24 hours before obtaining emergency abortion care or until the physicians satisfied varying obligations before commencing the abortion.

Drafted in response to the court injunction, SB 448 would have modified the definition of “medical emergency.” Modifications would have included removing references to determining gestational age of a fetus; adding language regarding necessary delays to comply with applicable statutory requirements concerning abortion; eliminating references to the “best medical judgment” of the attending physician; changing the determination of when an emergency exists in order to conform with the new definition of “medical emergency.”

Despite maintaining the misinformation in the “Woman’s Right to Know” website and changing the definition of “bodily function” to prevent damaging mental and emotional health exceptions for abortions, the revised definition of “medical emergency” would have reduced the number of obstacles for women seeking medical emergency abortions.

This bill would have still been considered anti-choice, but would have lessened some of the detrimental effects of a very anti-choice omnibus bill.

Status

SB 448 was drafted in response to lawsuits challenging sections of the 2013 omnibus bill, HB 2253 (See Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. Templeton and Hodes & Nauser MDs, P.A. v. Schmidt.)

SB 448 failed to pass on May 30, 2014. However the language of SB 448 was inserted into SB 54 through the “gut and go” process, and became current law on April 24, 2014.

Companion Bill to HB2508.


Legal Cases