
Culture & Conversation Abortion
This law was last updated on Mar 9, 2019
This law is Anti–Choice
HB 2281
Proposed
Feb 8, 2019
Co-sponsors: 1
Primary Sponsors: 1
Total Sponsors: 2
HB 2281 would prohibit a person from performing or attempting to perform an abortion if the person knows that the pregnant patient is seeking a sex selective abortion, or an abortion solely because the fetus has been or has the potential to be, diagnosed with Down syndrome or any other disability. This would not apply to a lethal fetal anomaly.
The bill further prohibits a person from intentionally performing or attempting to perform an abortion if the person knows that the pregnant patient is seeking the abortion solely because of the race, color, national origin, or ancestry of the fetus.
A person who knowingly or intentionally performs an abortion in violation of this provision may be subject to disciplinary sanctions and civil liability for wrongful death.
Perinatal Hospice
The bill would require the health department to develop a perinatal hospice brochure and post it on their website. The brochure would need to include the following:
The department would also need to develop a form on which a pregnant patient certifies, at the time of receiving a diagnosis that the fetus has lethal anomaly, that they have received the following:
The provider diagnosing the the lethal fetal anomaly would need to provide the pregnant patient with the brochure and the certification form.
At least 18 hours before an abortion is performed on a pregnant patient whose fetus has been diagnosed with a lethal anomaly, the physician performing the abortion would be required to:
If the pregnant patient decides to go ahead with the abortion, they would need to certify in writing at least 18 hours prior to the abortion.
Reporting Requirements
The bill would require abortion reports to include the following additional information: the gender of the fetus (if detectable), and whether the fetus has been diagnosed with or has a potential diagnosis of having Down syndrome or any other disability.
Human Rights Act
The bill would amend the Illinois Human Rights Act to expand the definition of “unlawful discrimination” to include the performance of an abortion solely because of the race, color, sex, disability, national origin, or ancestry of the fetus.
Sex-selection abortions are not a widespread problem in the United States. However, anti-choice activists cite three studies documenting the use of sex-selection abortion primarily among a small number of immigrant women. The National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum notes that a ban similar to the proposed Missouri ban “targets and thus limits reproductive health access for Asian American & Pacific Islander women, who anti-choicers say are the ones guilty of this abortion practice. We know the real solution to ending the preference for sons in some families is getting to the root of the problem: gender inequity. If lawmakers truly want to help us, we call on them to promote equal pay, access to education, health equity, and ending violence against women.”
Related Legislation
Identical to HB 282, which failed to pass during the 2017-2018 legislative session.
Latest Action
2/8/19 – Introduced.
Co-sponsor
Primary Sponsor