Use quotes to search for exact phrases. Use AND/OR/NOT between keywords or phrases for more precise search results.

Federal Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act 2013 (S 138)

This law was last updated on Jan 12, 2015




S 138


Failed to Pass


Jan 24, 2013


Primary Sponsors: 1
Co-sponsors: 15
Total Sponsors: 16


Sex- or Race-Selective Bans

Full Bill Text

S 138, also known as PRENDA, would have banned sex-selective abortions.

The bill would have imposed criminal penalties on anyone who knowingly or knowingly attempts to: (1) perform an abortion knowing that the abortion is sought based on the sex or gender of the child, (2) use force or the threat of force to intentionally injure or intimidate any person for the purpose of coercing a sex-selection abortion, (3) solicit or accept funds for the performance of such an abortion, or (4) transport a woman into the United States or across a state line for the purpose of obtaining such an abortion.

The bill defines “sex-selection abortion” as an abortion undertaken to eliminate an unborn child based on the sex or gender of the child.

The bill excludes from the definition of “abortion” actions taken to terminate a pregnancy if the intent is to save the life or preserve the health of the unborn child, remove a dead unborn child caused by spontaneous abortion, or remove an ectopic pregnancy.

The bill would have authorized civil actions and injunctive relief.

The bill also would have required a medical or mental health professional to report known or suspected violations to law enforcement authorities and would have imposed criminal penalties for a failure to so report. A health-care provider would not have had an affirmative duty to inquire as to the motivation for the abortion.

Sex-selection abortions are not a widespread problem in the United States. However, anti-choice activists cite three studies documenting the use of sex-selection abortion primarily among a small number of immigrant women. The National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum notes that a ban similar to the proposed Texas ban “targets and thus limits reproductive health access for Asian American & Pacific Islander women, who anti-choicers say are the ones guilty of this abortion practice. We know the real solution to ending the preference for sons in some families is getting to the root of the problem: gender inequity. If lawmakers truly want to help us, we call on them to promote equal pay, access to education, health equity, and ending violence against women.”


Companion bill to HR 447, which also failed to pass in 2013.