Senate business slowed to a crawl this week when Republicans inserted anti-choice language into a popular human trafficking bill that Democrats are now blocking until the language is removed.
But abortion isn’t the only human rights issue Republicans are fighting a proxy war over, using the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act debate. Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) is pushing a radical amendment to the bill that would end the practice of granting automatic citizenship to all children born in the United States.
Vitter’s amendment would only grant citizenship to a child born in the United States if one of the child’s parents is already a citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or a member of the military.
It’s an anti-immigration measure that Vitter claimed was relevant to the trafficking debate because of “birth tourism.” Some women, mostly Chinese, have allegedly paid thousands of dollars to give birth in “maternity motels” in California so that their children will have U.S. citizenship.
Roe has collapsed in Texas, and that's just the beginning.
Stay up to date with The Fallout, a newsletter from our expert journalists.
Because these women could theoretically be vulnerable to abuse or trafficking due to the “magnet” of birthright citizenship, Vitter reasoned on the Senate floor Tuesday, the answer to that problem is to ban birthright citizenship entirely.
Vitter said birthright citizenship involves “a fundamental misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment.”
Birthright citizenship was written into the 14th Amendment after the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision found that no African Americans, slave or free, could be U.S. citizens.
An 1898 decision involving a child of Chinese immigrants found that the 14th Amendment applied to children born in the United States regardless of their parents’ legal status.
That reveals some irony in Vitter’s decision to invoke Chinese immigrants in trying to overturn more than a century of Supreme Court jurisprudence.
Jessica González-Rojas, executive director of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health, called Vitter’s actions “despicable political grandstanding.”
“Senator Vitter has a long history of perpetuating harmful stereotypes about immigrant women and children to further his anti-immigrant agenda and today was no different,” González-Rojas said in a statement.
Indeed, Vitter’s bill isn’t new. He sponsored the same legislation as a stand-alone bill in 2013.
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) called Vitter’s amendment “stupid” on Wednesday.