Death, the GOP, and the Politics of Health Care Reform

Use quotes to search for exact phrases. Use AND/OR/NOT between keywords or phrases for more precise search results.

Death, the GOP, and the Politics of Health Care Reform

Scott Swenson

Why is it that in life's most personal and private moments - sexuality, conception, birth and the dying process, the party that says it governs least always governs most?

Fear is what the far right is. Fear is what they do. The
same people who bring you fear and misinformation about sexuality education, contraception,
family planning and abortion are once again stirring up fear about death.

We have nothing to fear, but fear itself.

There is no better way to stir up fear than to talk about
death — unless you combine talk about government and death. Most people don’t
want to think about death.  The far right
tried this in 1998 and 1999 in Congress when the party that touts "states’
rights" tried to overturn the popular will of voters who twice passed Oregon’s
Death with Dignity law. The far right tried it twice in the federal courts,
ultimately losing a 2006 Supreme Court case in a 6-3 decision allowing Oregon’s
now 12-year-old Death with Dignity law to stand. Last year Washington voters
made their Death with Dignity law the top vote getter in the state, at 59%,
besting even President Barack Obama.

The last time the far right stirred up public fear about
death they used extraordinary means to prevent a husband from carrying out his
wife’s wishes not to be left in a persistent vegetative state, intervening in a
family’s personal and private life decision. 
Remember Terri Schiavo?  The GOP
lost their House majority after voters saw how they exploited that situation,
so for Sarah Palin and others to be scaring people now about a "death panel" in
health care reform legislation demonstrates they care less about dying people
than they do about cheap political manipulations.

Roe is gone. The chaos is just beginning.

Follow Rewire News Group on Twitter to stay on top of every breaking moment.


Voters are consistently rejecting far right efforts to stir
up fear about death, and at every turn embracing policies that put more control
in the hands of terminally ill people by demanding improvements to end-of-life

The proposed health care reform allows Medicare to cover a
consultation about end-of-life wishes so that individuals and families – if
they want to – can make these very personal and private life decisions and put them in writing while they are
of sound mind and body. Terri Schiavo had only told her husband, never written
her wishes down, thus opening the door for political exploitation.

Fascinating how the far right can cry foul both when Ms.
Schiavo’s wishes were not in writing,
and also when efforts to get them in
writing for more people are proposed
.  Most everyone agreed the silver lining of the
Schiavo publicity was more people got Advance Directives, Living Wills, and in
other ways communicated their wishes to loved ones when they were not faced
with an emergency or incapable of communicating.

When was the last time you were in the hospital for anything
and weren’t asked to fill out forms about your end-of-life wishes "just in
case"? While unnerving contemplating your death while awaiting an outpatient
procedure, it makes sense. When was the last time you visited a friend or
relative who was close to death without being relieved to learn they had
clearly expressed their wishes to the doctors, whatever they might be.
Supporting the dying person and honoring their wishes is the goal of all major
efforts to improve end-of-life care, and of every friend or family member at a
dying person’s bedside.

No surprise, the same people who routinely promote
misinformation and scare tactics about abortion, contraception and sexuality
education are also behind this latest effort to scare you at the end-of-life in
order to derail serious health care reform. The Institute for Southern Studies
reports that anti-choice
Rep. Sonny Isakson (R-GA) was the architect of the bogus "death panel"

intended to scare people.  Perhaps that’s
why fellow Georgia Republican Congressman Jack Kingston knew it was a "scare
tactic" as he told Bill Maher.

Why is it that in life’s most personal and private moments –
sexuality, conception, birth and the dying process, the party that says it governs least always governs
most?  Why does the party of rugged
individualists like Sarah Palin never trust individual women to make reproductive
health decisions, and why now, do they distrust all of us to know what is best
for us and our families when it comes to our death?

Sort of makes you wonder, if they will lie to you about sex,
birth and death, what won’t they lie to you about?

Topics and Tags:

aid in dying, Health-Care Reform